Hello! Community Page
- bgeek.net Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- And thanks to the Mindscape team for giving a couple of really cool prizes! Kirk
- What also works is opening the created song.mg file directly from windows explorer. Then I could switch to MGrammar mode. But this is a great solution to let it work independent of the way how...
- I haven't used oslo for a while, but last time I installed there was a "Samples mode" link in the start menu. did you try that?
- fwiw, it works when I *don't* use Control+Shit+G, rather select from the mode combo box MGrammar mode.
- It didn't work for me. I made sure I followed the steps exactly, twice, and both times ended up with the Input.Song pane in MGrammar mode, and the Song.mg pane in DynamicParser Mode. Also, the...
Jump to original thread »
So as I’ve been doing some Ruby+Rails work recently, I’ve become very enamoured of Rspec, it’s ability to turn plain text tests into runable tests is awesome.
I love that I can run this as an automated test:
Story: News Page
As a visitor
I Want to go to the news site
So that I can keep up with all [...] ... Continue reading »
I love that I can run this as an automated test:
Story: News Page
As a visitor
I Want to go to the news site
So that I can keep up with all [...] ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
In the future I plan to introduce extension methods to allow specifying on the object itself. I actually did a prove of concept a while back. The problems I found was that you can't have the following syntax
user.Must.Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");
but rather as follows
user.Must().Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");
which I don't mind.
I'm working on a Auto Test library and Notifier application. I have an almost stable version and if you are interested, let me know. With this application I plan to have the same sort of specdoc to be displayed (as in rspec on TextMate). Maybe in the browser, I'll see when I get there...
My only problem at the moment is I'm stuck in .NET 2.0 land in my day job, so my understanding and exploration of 3.5 features suffers at the moment...