-
Website
http://bgeek.net/ -
Original page
http://bgeek.net/2008/02/14/nspecify-rspec-well-closer-anyway/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
bohtho
1 comment · 1 points
-
buildmaster
12 comments · 1 points
-
scarnie
1 comment · 1 points
-
franksalinas
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Behaviour Driven Development
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Behaviour Driven Development
In the future I plan to introduce extension methods to allow specifying on the object itself. I actually did a prove of concept a while back. The problems I found was that you can't have the following syntax
user.Must.Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");
but rather as follows
user.Must().Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");
which I don't mind.
I'm working on a Auto Test library and Notifier application. I have an almost stable version and if you are interested, let me know. With this application I plan to have the same sort of specdoc to be displayed (as in rspec on TextMate). Maybe in the browser, I'll see when I get there...
My only problem at the moment is I'm stuck in .NET 2.0 land in my day job, so my understanding and exploration of 3.5 features suffers at the moment...