<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bgeek.net - Latest Comments in NSpecify =&amp;gt; RSpec&amp;#8230; well closer anyway</title><link>http://bgeek.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bgeek.disqus.com/nspecify_gt_rspec8230_well_closer_anyway/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:27:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NSpecify =&amp;gt; RSpec&amp;#8230; well closer anyway</title><link>http://bgeek.net/2008/02/14/nspecify-rspec-well-closer-anyway/#comment-1174653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firstly, I'd like to thank you for your contributions to the NSpecify project. I really like the Context, BeforeEach, etc synonyms that you've added. The lambda support you've added is also pretty cool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the future I plan to introduce extension methods to allow specifying on the object itself. I actually did a prove of concept a while back. The problems I found was that you can't have the following syntax&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;user.Must.Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but rather as follows&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;user.Must().Not.Allow(user.Save).With.Error("A user must have a name before being saved");&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;which I don't mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm working on a Auto Test library and Notifier application. I have an almost stable version and if you are interested, let me know. With this application I plan to have the same sort of specdoc to be displayed (as in rspec on TextMate). Maybe in the browser, I'll see when I get there...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My only problem at the moment is I'm stuck in .NET 2.0 land in my day job, so my understanding and exploration of 3.5 features suffers at the moment...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maruismarais</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>