<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bgeek.net - Latest Comments in Tech Ed NZ 2008 Day 3</title><link>http://bgeek.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bgeek.disqus.com/tech_ed_nz_2008_day_3/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:59:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tech Ed NZ 2008 Day 3</title><link>http://bgeek.net/2008/09/04/tech-ed-nz-2008-day-3/#comment-3892604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think your product is world famaous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eq2 plat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Ed NZ 2008 Day 3</title><link>http://bgeek.net/2008/09/04/tech-ed-nz-2008-day-3/#comment-2150142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Owen,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding LINQ to SQL being config heavy: I don't like that aspect of LINQ to SQL either.  So I put together a proof-of-concept implementation of something with no config other than some almost-pure C# objects:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.codeplex.com/Close2Poco" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.codeplex.com/Close2Poco"&gt;http://www.codeplex.com/Clo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Rusk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>